Among 1,275 registered type 2 diabetes patients in the health center, 621 subjects with type 2 diabetes participated in the study. To compare the predictability of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) risk engine, and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) for carotid atherosclerosis and peripheral arterial disease in Korean type 2 diabetic patients. Korean Journal of Family Medicine 32(3): 189-196 Cardiovascular risk is best evaluated with an estimation that takes into account the individuals characteristics and risk factors.Comparison of the Framingham Risk Score, UKPDS Risk Engine, and SCORE for Predicting Carotid Atherosclerosis and Peripheral Arterial Disease in Korean Type 2 Diabetic PatientsĪhn, H-Ran. Nevertheless, the American Diabetes Association has recognized that absolute risk for cardiovascular disease varies among individuals with diabetes and has recommended the use of designed models and algorithms to estimate risk, especially in younger patients ( < 40 years). Diabetes itself has been considered a cardiovascular disease equivalent. The presence of traditional and nontraditional risk factors that frequently coexist with type 2 diabetes are associated with this higher cardiovascular risk. Mexico DF, Mexico.,IranĪbstract: Individuals with type 2 diabetes have a two to four fold increased risk for developing cardiovascular disease than persons without diabetes. Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Vasco de Quiroga No.Title: UKPDS Risk Engine, Decode and Diabetes PHD Models for the Estimation of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with DiabetesĪuthor(s): Paloma Almeda-Valdes, Daniel Cuevas-Ramos, Roopa Mehta, Francisco J. Keywords: Cardiovascular risk, Diabetes mellitus, UKPDS risk engine, Diabetes PHD, DECODE In this review we will discuss the pros and cons of each model, their use in clinical practice and the application of the UKPDS risk engine and PHD model in a Mexican population. Specifically, the DECODE (Diabetes Epidemiology: Collaborative analysis of Diagnostic criteria in Europe) equation has been shown to have discriminative capacity of 0.67 the UKPDS Risk Engine model is reported to have a sensitivity of around 90% and specificity of 33% and the Diabetes Personal Health Decisions (PHD) in our study had a sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 41%. The algorithms and models that have been designed specifically for the assessment of cardiovascular risk in individuals with diabetes will be the subject of this review. Cardiovascular risk is best evaluated with an estimation that takes into account the individuals characteristics and risk factors. Individuals with type 2 diabetes have a two to four fold increased risk for developing cardiovascular disease than persons without diabetes.